Wednesday, 25. September 2013

In it analyzes of the management of the logistic costs, you vary particularitities must be analyzed, therefore to reduce the cost of an isolated activity does not result, necessarily, in the reduction of the total cost. Exemplificando: To concentrate products in a COMPACT DISC will reduce costs of inventories and storage, but it will be able to increase the transport costs. In the attainment of the competitive advantage, these factors can be on to the analysis of the total cost, that considers all the factors affected for the effect of a decision taking and focuses the otimizao of the costs of the logistic components. The main objective of the management of costs is to create strategies that reduce costs and provide the efficient integration of the departments of the company, focando competitive prices for the sales of the product. In this direction Guilhoto and Milone (2001) they point out in the market, the company can choose for carrying through its sales directly to the final user or using an intermediary, using to advantage the maximum of chances that the market provides, to enter in new niches of markets, or to transfer responsibilities to the canals, however so that this occurs it is necessary that the company mount a distribution system that takes care of to objectives. The logistic cost, when analyzed in its totality, requires to understand the context inserted, therefore according to ASLOG the logistic cost means of 15 16% of the total cost of the products in Brazil, being able to arrive at 30% in some companies. In developed countries the average is of 9 the 10%. An efficiently analyzed, interpreted and lead time, the management of logistic costs is resulted in the performance, that provides to the organization the competitive differential, directing action for improvement in the results of the following item:? Capacity of reply the demands of the customers? Lead teamses reduced, Better levels of service to the customers.? Product quality and services? Relationship of partnerships with customers and suppliers.? Speed, quality and timing of the innovation in the products? Products and services brought to the market more quickly.? Effectiveness of the production costs and use of the capital? Processes of the simple, effective and efficient chain, to become source of competitive advantage.? Performance profitability in the long run? Reduction of cost I eliminate and greater profit.


Tuesday, 17. September 2013

So much to learn, to teach, there are different ways of learning or teaching which contain a sequence of techniques that help us to develop, and so, if we teach, we must design the process so that students achieve the highest possible learning and even more practical and applicable approach to the resolution of the different types of problems. On the other hand, if we that we will learn, we must choose the most appropriate way to achieve this learning method of teaching and make it as profitable as possible. In a logical organization, there are different types of teaching, which I will allow me to state for information: PROGRESSIVE EDUCATION This by definition, takes us from the simple to the complex, ie in stages, is understand the above to continue with the following. In many countries apply this method to teach math, takes the student from the simple to the complex in a sequence. LA EDUCATION VARIED This methodology involves a variety of techniques, tasks, jobs, exhibitions etc. You have several options to avoid complicating the issues.

EDUCATIONAL STIMULATING This encourages us to be creators of DO agree or based on the way to be the student, for example, this also applies to CFE in the skills of innovation and entrepreneurship by giving awards and incentives to outstanding employees and implemented in business innovations. THE EDUCATION COOPERATIVE This encourages mutual help, not competition, is here promoting the exchange of experience which promotes working together. In the latter type of education I want to address, because I find it very important and also suitable for application in the company where he worked the CFE. Where can we learn more and better if not with our own experiences of colleagues working in other similar departments in other areas or zones? I think that, based on the exchange of experiences of ourselves, we can be rich knowledge that will help us be better and more suitable in our place we play. Do not forget that when new equipment arrives to our areas, we ask otr kind of training course to operate this new equipment. I put too much emphasis of the latter type of education, which will help us and keep us better able to deal more conducive to suffer any disruption or damage to our equipment to arrive to suffer them.

This applies both technically and administratively, since the organization formed as a micro business is similar in one area and another. Therefore, include the following definitions: "COOPERATIVE: it continues to control the teacher or leader. "COLLABORATIVE: The position of the leader or teacher is shared with other partners. So here than in a micro has partners and a leader, which is changing or rotating the role between the partners. CARMONA JESUS MANUEL SILVA CAMARGO ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT RPE 9ARXC UNIT DELICIAS

The Trader

Monday, 2. September 2013

Trader achieved these results for three consecutive months. Reaching goals trade on a demo account, he decided it was time to start trading with real money. Begin trading with real money, but things are changing rapidly. Instead of trading method, which followed the trader to trade on demo account, he began to miss the deal, trying to choose the winning trades, instead of taking 40% of losing trades. Of course, he always chooses the more losers than winners.

Then, trying to fix this problem, the trader decides that it is possible enters the market too late. So now, instead wait for the final formation of the trade setup before signing the deal, the trader tries to enter earlier, which leads to deterioration of the losses. Given the continuing losses in the course of entering the emotions: 'What's wrong? Why do I always lose? Maybe it's not my fault, maybe my method stopped working? " Problems with the worse each transaction – the more emotion, the more losing trades and the trader, ultimately, leaves the trade. Now the trader decides that the trading results on a demo account were not really adequate for the start of trading for real money. Trader returns to trading on a demo account and re-examined. Thoughts that are now a trader: "Maybe I should try other methods of trading, until I can eliminate those lead to losing trades. Then I'll be ready again to trade for real money. In fact, maybe I should opt out of trade, maybe I'm simply complete loser and that's why I can not trade successfully.