Stock Investing Zone

Through Professor of organizational behavior, in addition to workshops, weeklies taught in this regard, emphasis is give way to a new leadership, not just identifying needs, opportunities for the environment where models, encouraging the development of the company work, but the Community country in order to provide solutions to the problems faced, proposals,, showing new paradigms for Venezuelan administrative needs, to which is a genuine favourable organizational culture. Becomes much emphasis that future leaders have presented some aspects that must be analyzed, considered in its exercise, including pro precisely this cultivate empathy that is neglected by many who want to become leaders. Be considered that the skills to understand with people deserve more attention from which usually is paid when speaking of leadership. Some of those skills as human behavior experts, indicate it may teach but not all. Bennis (1990) thereon tells us, that empathy (charisma) is maybe something that an individual has or does not have. Not all leaders have it, but many Yes. By the way, in your company, organization, work, you think that empathy is manifested? What is your opinion on the matter? Do you consider that it is an important feature? It is estimated that our national leaders in top positions in the country, have empathy or are in that position by the tentacles of power. By the same guilds Marty Kaplan once said: I have known leaders that they had nothing of that quality and, however they were leaders, but which Yes had it have impressed me and inspired me more.

Has this happened it to you?, why that empathy do favourable? what has motivated him, captivated specifically her?. Gloria Steinen for his part added: there are many excellent, efficient people who don’t know about empathy. Since then, Rogerd Gould, CITES him empathy is not the only factor to win people, sometimes you need to establish a kind of leadership by consensus, based on that it was the group who raises problems and seeks solutions.

The pages of the history of the invention and construction of metronomes, are full of failure and impractical ideas, but if we can find some success. Why a tiny sector attracted so many inventors is a mystery. First attempts in 1581, Galileo Galilei discovered the isochronism of pendulums, i.e., discovered that pendulums equals (of any length) vibrate at the same time regardless if the amplitude is large or small. Close to a century passed before the theory of pendulums was successfully applied to the manufacture of clocks by Christian Huygens (1659) and George Graham (1715). In 1656 patented you first pendulum clock, which allowed to measure time more accurately.

Huygens was built several clocks pendulum to determine the longitude at sea, which made several trips between 1662 and 1686. These inventors solved the problem of pulses of pendulums using a leak or exhaust, that would keep it moving without interfering with its movement. This invention was the key the success was immediately used by those working in the field of metronome. In 1696, Etieune Loulie made the first attempt to apply the pendulum of a metronome. His team was no more than an adjustable pendulum with calibrations, but without exhaust to keep it moving.

It was followed by a line of inventors, including Sauveur, 1711; Enbrayg, 1732; 1771 Gabary, Harrison, 1775; Davaux 1784; Pelletier, Weiske, 1790; Weber, 1813; Stockel, Zmeskall, Aperture, Smart, 1821. Most of these attempts were unsuccessful due to the great length of pendulum needed to imitate some of the slow rhythms used in music (e.g., 40 to 60 per minute). In 1812, Nikolaus Winkel Dietrik (born-1780 Amsterdam, dead-1826) found that a pendulum weighted and double (a weight to each side of the pivot) could oscillate at a slow pace, even when they were short. Johann Nepenuk Maelzel, through some questionable practices, appropriated the idea of Winkel, and in 1816 began to manufacture the so-called metronome Maelzel.