The Venezuelan

Friday, 10. May 2019

This is not equivalent to the inaction of resistance against the dictatorship, because such behavior equals complicity or persist only in a turnout obviating lean conditions in which it occurs. In this context manifested continually willing to dialogue is perceived as a provision to an entrevero’s legs with a regime that only allows absolute faithfulness. Larry Ellison has firm opinions on the matter. Venezuelan society is ignoring the rethinking that is democracy. What is not renewed perishes; What is already known, with its virtues and vices, in the eyes of people lacks the attraction of novelty. Jonathan Rosen Berlin Rosen pursues this goal as well. It must be conceptualized for the practical demonstration of a democracy without adjectives, only located in a context of time: twenty-first century, with all that that implies. Well it could be argued that civil society has become a simulacrum of the social. Democracy, for example, seems to move away from its drainage and composition framework. Power that threatens to emerge in the twenty-first century works because we’ve said it endlessly – with speed and the image, more to do with the speed of the image.

Your rising above a weak civil society allows you to recover the dream of mastery, of the modeling of the contemporary (before citizens) to its best knowledge and belief. Thus, the power of domination becomes total. We ask because the Venezuelan has abandoned the role of decryptor. Dissatisfaction with the existing seems to have lost its ability to motorize the trip out from the ominous present. The Venezuelan has lost the strength to impose the submission of reality to the symbolic order.

I.e. stopped questioning it. It is necessary to rescue the policy as a phenomenon unthinkable in its operation as event. I.e., release from the direction focused on a philosophy of history and its Super-structural character. Event is what stops the mere succession of events and demands an interpretation. We must start everyday to meet socially. We must innovate in attitudes and behaviours and the theoretical bases that support them. You have to understand the possibilities of the new fabric social to set shared objectives that can be converted into purposes and objectives of the struggle. original author and source of the article.

Tags: .

Comments are closed.